Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00717
Original file (BC 2014 00717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00717

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 




APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her record be corrected to reflect the correct number of Air 
Force Achievement Medals (AFAMs) (Administratively corrected).

Her record be corrected to reflect the Joint Service 
Commendation Medal (JSCM).




APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In preparation for the Air Force Reduction in Force Boards, she 
reviewed her records and noticed that two of her AFAMs reflect 
“First Oak Leaf Cluster”.  This error impacts not only her third 
but also her fourth subsequent award of this Medal.  

She also received a JSCM which is reflected in the Air Force 
Virtual Military Personnel Flight (VMPF) system; but does not 
reflect in the Personnel Records Display Application (PRDA).

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.




STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 19 Jul 07, the applicant was awarded the AFAM for outstanding 
achievement.

On 4 Aug 08, the applicant was awarded the AFAM, First Oak Leaf 
Cluster for outstanding achievement.

On 11 Feb 09, the applicant was awarded the AFAM, First Oak Leaf 
Cluster for meritorious service.

On 28 Jun 13, the applicant was awarded the AFAM, Second Oak 
Leaf Cluster for meritorious service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    




AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  

The JSCM may be awarded in the name of the Secretary of Defense 
to members of the United States Armed Forces who, while assigned 
to a joint activity after 1 Jan 63, distinguished themselves by 
meritorious achievement or service.  Award for meritorious 
service is generally for a period of time greater than 12 months 
and encompassing an individual’s entire joint assignment, 
including extensions.  Service members assigned and/or attached 
to a Joint Task Force as individuals (not as members of a 
service unit) may also be eligible for the JSCM.  Members of 
service-unique units assigned and/or attached to a Joint Task 
Force retain eligibility for award of personal decorations from 
their parent services. They may not be awarded Defense/Joint 
decorations.  The JSCM will not be awarded for any period of 
service for which a Military Department medal is awarded.

They were unable to locate a Special Order or signed certificate 
and citation verifying the applicant was recommended and 
approved for the award of the JSCM.  The Special Order is the 
official source documentation for verification of an approved 
decoration.  The applicant did not provide any documentation to 
support her claim.  The Military Personnel Data System does 
reflect the JSCM was updated; however, the entry does not 
contain any information from the Special Order to include the 
Special Order number, Headquarters level at which the decoration 
was approved and it is also lacking the applicant’s PASCODE 
where the decoration was awarded.  This missing data leads to 
the question the authenticity of the update.  Furthermore, the 
applicant’s records do not reflect assignment to a joint 
activity which is required to be eligible for consideration of a 
joint decoration.  Unless the applicant is able to provide a 
copy of the JSCM decoration elements to include the Special 
Order, Certificate and Citation they believe the information in 
system is an error.  To grant relief would be contrary to the 
criteria established by DoDM 1348.33.M, Manual for Decorations, 
the Secretary of the Air Force, Chief of Staff and/or the War 
Department.

With regard to the AFAMs, after a thorough review of the 
applicant’s official military personnel record, DPSID was able 
to verify the presence of an error relating to the number of 
AFAMs.  The AFAM, First Oak Leaf Cluster dated 11 Feb 09, should 
read the AFAM, Second Oak Leaf Cluster; and the AFAM, Second Oak 
Leaf Cluster, dated 28 Jun 13, should read AFAM, Third Oak Leaf 
Cluster.  The applicant’s decoration elements have been 
administratively corrected via corrected copies.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.




APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 22 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.




THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
that relief beyond that already granted administratively is not 
warranted.




THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00717 in Executive Session on 26 Feb 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 Feb 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 25 Apr 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Sep 14.

						





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01214

    Original file (BC-2006-01214.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial indicating that they assume the misrepresented information the applicant is referring to is the Board Discrepancy Report filed in her Officer Selection Record (OSR) indicating the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) was not updated in the Military Personnel Data System and that the Defense Meritorious Service Medal (DMSM) citation was missing from her OSR. They have verified...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00984

    Original file (BC 2014 00984.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00984 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for outstanding achievement, rendered for the period 15 May 08 through 26 Jun 13, be replaced by the AFAM, First Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) for outstanding achievement for the period 26 Jun 13 through 14 Aug 13. However, it appears the approval authority recognized the error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02046

    Original file (BC-2003-02046.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Current Air Force promotion policy (AFI 36-2502) dictates that before a decoration is credited for a specific promotion cycle, the close out date of the decoration must be on or before the Promotion Eligibility Cutoff Date (PECD), and the date of the DÉCOR-6, Request for Decoration Printout (RDP), or in this case the AF Form 3994, must be before the date of selections for the cycle in question. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00661

    Original file (BC 2014 00661.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00661 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM), Second Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (2BOLC) on 11 Jul 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05772

    Original file (BC 2012 05772.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    .RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05772 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be corrected to reflect the following medals: 1. Global War on Terrorism Service (GWOT-S) Medal (Will be administratively corrected). The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03532

    Original file (BC 2014 03532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AFAM was authorized by the Secretary of the Air Force on 12 Oct 80 and is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States and foreign military personnel, below the rank of Colonel, after 30 Sep 80 who while serving in any capacity with the United States Air Force, distinguish themselves by meritorious service or achievement. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel records, they were unable to verify award of the AFAM. Therefore, we recommend...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05295

    Original file (BC 2012 05295.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05295 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A special order be accomplished and the order number be placed on her certificate for award of the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for the period of 15 November 1992 to 11 June 1996. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05763

    Original file (BC 2013 05763.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 Feb 13, the Director, Military Personnel Human Resources Directorate was notified that the applicant was awarded the JSCM, dated 9 May 12, and was subsequently awarded the JSCM (1OLC), dated 11 Oct 12, for the same act and period. There is no evidence in the applicant’s record, nor did the applicant provide any official documentation verifying he or his chain of command attempted to exhaust administrative avenues by requesting reconsideration of the downgrade through the original...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00527

    Original file (BC-2010-00527.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00527 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: An order number be assigned to her award of the Air Force Achievement Medal Second Oak leaf Cluster (AFAM/2OLC) for the period 1 January 2007 through 4 February 2008. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04194

    Original file (BC-2012-04194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04194 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), and National Defense Service Medal (NDSM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office...